OCTOBER 12, 2026
Live Feed
Back to database
Case File

CVE-2026-90091

HIGH · CVSS 8 EPSS 0.41%

Source: NVD + CISA KEV + EPSS · Published 2026-09-17 · Last synced 2026-10-12

CyberRota Analysis

AI-Generated

The vulnerability affects the Linux kernel's handling of Bluetooth L2CAP sockets, specifically in the race condition between the cleanup and channel management functions, which can lead to a null pointer dereference. This flaw could potentially allow an attacker to disrupt Bluetooth communications or cause system instability. Organizations using Linux systems with Bluetooth capabilities should prioritize addressing this vulnerability to ensure the integrity and reliability of their network communications.

CVE
CVE-2026-90091
Severity
HIGH
CVSS
8
EPSS
0.41%
Linux

Original NVD Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix race l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen() vs. put_chan For L2CAP sockets without owning sk->sk_socket, reading l2cap_pi(sk)->chan may race against concurrent l2cap_sock_kill() -> l2cap_sock_put_chan(). This excludes simultaneous proto_ops callbacks, but access in l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen() has unsafe lockless read. [Task 1] [Task 2 (hdev->workqueue)] l2cap_sock_release(parent) l2cap_disconn_cfm l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen l2cap_conn_del bt_accept_dequeue l2cap_chan_del lock_sock(sk) l2cap_sock_teardown_cb bt_accept_unlink bt_sk(sk)->parent = NULL release_sock(sk) ----------------> lock_sock(sk) parent = /* NULL */ lock_sock(sk) <--------------------- release_sock(sk) sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED) l2cap_sock_close_cb l2cap_sock_kill(sk) l2cap_sock_put_chan chan = READ l2cap_pi(sk)->chan l2cap_pi(sk)->chan = NULL l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero l2cap_put_chan(chan) kref_get_unless_zero(&chan->ref) Task 1 may observe NULL which causes null-ptr-deref. Fix the race by taking lock_sock() in l2cap_sock_kill() to synchronize with l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen(). hold_unless_zero() is not needed here, l2cap_pi(sk)->chan owns reference if it is non-NULL. Clarify code comments vs. locking.