CyberRota Analysis
AI-GeneratedCatalyst::Seal versions prior to 0.03 for Perl are vulnerable to a flaw that allows an attacker to bypass authorization checks by exploiting a memoization mechanism that incorrectly associates request paths with dispatch actions. This can lead to unauthorized access to actions, particularly when a GET request is used to disable a POST-only action, potentially allowing attackers to manipulate request handling and access sensitive functionality. Organizations using affected versions should prioritize remediation to prevent unauthorized access and ensure proper authorization enforcement in their applications.
Original NVD Description
Catalyst::Seal versions before 0.03 for Perl allow one request to disable a path or route a later one past an authorization check via a dispatch memo keyed on the request path alone. Catalyst::Seal replaces the dispatcher's prepare_action with a version that memoises how a path resolved: which dispatch type matched, at which level, and what was left over as arguments. The key is the request path and nothing else. Action roles that match on the method, content type, scheme or query make that resolution depend on state the key does not carry, so the memo answers for a request it was not built from. A path that resolves to no action is memoised as well, and replaying that entry returns without consulting any dispatch type, so no action is set and the request fails. A GET of a path whose action is declared POST-only therefore disables that path for every later request, the correct POST included. An entry that did resolve replays the level the earlier descent reached. Where a POST-only action sits below a shallower action on the same path, a GET memoises the shallow route, and a later POST is dispatched there with an auto() guarding the deeper controller never running. The memo is cleared only when an action is registered, which happens at setup, so an entry lasts for the life of the process, and its cap of 2048 entries bounds how many paths one caller can disable. In the configuration measured, the misroute lands on the less privileged action, so it is an authorization check not running rather than a privilege gain.