SEPTEMBER 10, 2026
Live Feed
Vulnerability Register

CVE Database

Synced from NVD, cross-referenced against CISA KEV and EPSS · ordered by last update

372,209 records on file
Page 762 of 12,407
CVE ID Score Description
Exploit 25d ago
8.1

SigNoz before 0.134.0 contains an open redirect vulnerability in the SSO authentication flow that allows unauthenticated attackers to steal session tokens from any user on instances configured with Google OAuth, SAML, or OIDC. Attackers can call the unauthenticated sessions context endpoint with a ref parameter pointing to an attacker-controlled host, deliver the resulting crafted login URL to a victim, and receive the victim's access and refresh tokens when they complete SSO authentication.

Exploit 25d ago
8.8

Cursor for Windows version 3.2.16 contains a binary planting vulnerability that allows remote attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by placing a malicious git.exe file in the repository root directory. When a developer clones and opens a crafted repository, Cursor automatically resolves and executes the workspace-resident git.exe during IDE startup and on a recurring timed cadence without any user interaction, running the malicious binary under the privileges of the current user.

25d ago
6.5

Incorrect access control in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 9.x qemu-server before 9.1.8 and 8.x before 8.4.8 allows users within limited privileges to obtain hashed passwords via the cloudinit/dump API.

25d ago
7.2

A race condition between the vncproxy and vncwebsocket API calls in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 9.x pve-manager before 9.1.9 and 8.x before 8.4.19; qemu-server 9.x before 9.1.7 and 8.x before 8.4.7; and pve-container before 6.1.3 (PVE 9.x) and before 5.3.4 (PVE 8.x) allows an attacker with privileges to call "vncproxy" to hijack a VNC session that is established in parallel by a different user for a different VM.

25d ago
6.1

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 9.x 5.1.8 and Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 8.x 4.3.16 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload.

25d ago
5.4

A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because OAuth 2.0 authorization codes are not properly bound to the client that originally requested them. An attacker who can intercept an authorization code can modify it to be redeemed by their own client, potentially allowing them to obtain access tokens for a victim's identity.

Exploit 25d ago
6.3

A security flaw has been discovered in mosaxiv clawlet up to 0.2.10. Impacted is the function list/remove of the file tools/tool_cron.go of the component cron Chat Tool. The manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed with the label "not planned".

25d ago
6.4

Missing support for integrity check vulnerability in ABB KNX Update Tool (ABB), ABB KNX Update Tool (BJE). This issue affects KNX Update Tool (ABB): through 2.0.175; KNX Update Tool (BJE): through 2.0.175.

25d ago
7.5

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway & SEPPmail Cloud before version 15.0.4.2 allows an attacker to replay & hijack a user session in the GINA web portal, as the session token is disclosed inside the URL and a HTTP header.

25d ago
7.5

Insertion of sensitive information into sent data vulnerability in IKAS Technology Inc. E-Commerce allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects E-Commerce: through 03062026.

25d ago
9.8

libpvestorage-perl v9.1.1 and libpve-storage-perl v8.3.7 were discovered to contain an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability.

25d ago
4.9

A flaw was found in the organization management component of Keycloak. A delegated administrator with permission to manage organizations can create an invitation for a non-existent email address and then retrieve the secret registration link directly through the application programming interface. By using this link, the administrator can create new user accounts and add them to the organization without having the required user management permissions or access to the invited email account. This allows an administrator to bypass security boundaries and add unauthorized members to an organization.

Exploit 25d ago
7.3

A vulnerability was identified in poco-ai poco-claw up to 0.5.4. This issue affects the function run_task of the file executor/app/api/v1/task.py. The manipulation of the argument callback_url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

Exploit 25d ago
6.3

A vulnerability was determined in poco-ai poco-claw up to 0.5.4. This vulnerability affects the function create_task of the file executor_manager/app/api/v1/tasks.py of the component executor_manager API. Executing a manipulation can lead to missing authentication. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 0.5.7 is able to resolve this issue. This patch is called 67fcc88505c57f77d3fcf04eb5b89425b10cbf48. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Exploit 25d ago
8.1

AhnLab EPP Management v1.0.14.32-6249 was discovered to contain a NoSQL injection vulnerability via the eventlog/agentEvent/list endpoint.

25d ago
5.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since HTTP OPTIONS method is enabled on this web server. The OPTIONS method provides a list of the methods that are supported by the Web server which allows an attacker to narrow and intensify their efforts.

25d ago
4.2

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack as the application implements an HTML5 cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) policy for this request that allows access from any domain (*-Wildcard).

25d ago
4.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable since the application does not have a validation for HOST header and accepts arbitrary hosts when requested in http protocol. When an application doesn’t adequately validate or sanitize this header, it can lead to several security risks, including Host header poisoning, server misconfigurations.

25d ago
5.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the application returns detailed error messages that leak information about the processing on the server. An attacker may use the contents of error messages to help launch another ,more focused attack.

25d ago
5.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since It was found that a malicious actor can use brute-force techniques to either guess or confirm valid users in the system. Use renumeration is when a malicious actor can use brute-force techniques to either guess or confirm valid users in a system

25d ago
3.7

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the Application is vulnerable to Lucky 13. that makes the SS LLUCKY13 possible affects the TLS1.1and 1.2 and DTLS1.0 or 1.2 implementations . It also affects previous versions such as SSL3.0 and TLS1.0. This can also be considered a type of man-in-the-middle attack.

25d ago
4.2

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack as cookie appears to contain a session token, which may increase the risk associated with this issue. You should review the contents of the cookie to determine its function.

25d ago
4.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the application does not have an appropriate caching policy specifying the extent to which the page and its form fields should be cached. If sensitive information in application responses is stored in the local cache, then this may be retrieved by other users who have access to the same computer at a future time.

25d ago
4.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by clickjacking vulnerability Cross-Frame Scripting is an attack technique where an attacker loads a vulnerable application in an iFrame on his malicious site. The attacker can then launch a Clickjacking attack, which may lead to Phishing, Cross-Site Request Forgery, sensitive information leakage and more.

25d ago
4.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the server is not configured with “X-XSS-Protection" header

25d ago
5.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attacks since the server software version used by the application is revealed by the web server. Displaying version information of software could allow an attacker to determine which vulnerabilities are present in the software, particularly if an outdated software version is in use with published vulnerabilities.

25d ago
4.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Sensitive Information in GET method & in URL which allows application to pass sensitive data via URL parameters during normal usage. Data passed in this manner can be exposed because it may end up stored in unintended locations, including server logs, local browser history and proxy logs.

25d ago
6.5

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to brute force attacks since application doesn’t have captcha implemented. It can lead to various security issues like brute force , automated attacks & account enumeration

25d ago
5.3

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to email flooding as the application does not have a proper mail limitation mechanism at Forget Password functionality. The actor could b e a human or an automated process such as a virus or bot. This could be used to cause a denial of service, compromise program logic or other consequences.

25d ago
9.1

HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Business Logic Vulnerability using which a non valid user of the application can obtain passwords from the server and redirect them to their own email address by manipulating the server's response. The application includes checks in the initial requests to verify the validity of the provided UserId, but similar validation is not applied to Email requests when sending passwords to user emails.