CVE Database
Synced from NVD, cross-referenced against CISA KEV and EPSS · ordered by last update
| CVE ID | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61873 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61438 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61440. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61440. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61440 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61427. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61427. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61427 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-60085. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-60085. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-60085 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61435. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61435. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61435 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61433. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61433. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61433 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61436. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61436. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61436 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61430. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61430. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61430 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61443. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61443. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61443 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61446. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61446. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61446 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-60087. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-60087. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-60087 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61449. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61449. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61449 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61451. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61451. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61451 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61452. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61452. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61452 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61453. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61453. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61453 instead of this candidate. |
| 25d ago | — | Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61457. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61457. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61457 instead of this candidate. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 7.5 | Apollo is a reliable configuration management system suitable for microservice configuration management scenarios. Prior to 2.5.2, Apollo ConfigService may allow unauthorized access to raw configuration data when AccessKey or management key authentication is enabled because requests under /configfiles/raw/{appId}/{clusterName}/{namespace} are parsed for authentication as appId raw instead of the actual path appId, causing ConfigService to look up AccessKey secrets for raw before verifying the request signature and potentially continue without signature verification for the target appId. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.2. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 7.5 | Apollo is a reliable configuration management system suitable for microservice configuration management scenarios. Prior to 2.5.2, Apollo ConfigService may allow unauthorized access to configuration data when AccessKey or management key authentication is enabled because ConfigService can accept a non-canonical appId variant during authentication while downstream request handling resolves it to the protected app, including accent variants under accent-insensitive collations or trailing-space variants under PAD SPACE collations on /configs and /configfiles endpoints. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.2. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 9.3 | Lightpanda is a headless browser designed for AI and automation. Prior to 0.2.9, Lightpanda fetch() and XMLHttpRequest unconditionally attached session cookies to every HTTP request, ignoring credentials: omit, credentials: same-origin, credentials: include, and XMLHttpRequest.withCredentials, allowing an attacker-controlled origin in a Lightpanda session to issue authenticated cross-origin requests against a victim origin. This issue is fixed in version 0.2.9. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 9.3 | Lightpanda is a headless browser designed for AI and automation. Prior to 0.3.1, Lightpanda searched for @ across the entire URL string instead of only the authority component when computing a page origin, so a URL such as `http://attacker.com/@victim.com/` was fetched from attacker.com but treated as `http://victim.com`, allowing a complete Same-Origin Policy bypass. This issue is fixed in version 0.3.1. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 5.4 | SurrealDB is a scalable, distributed, collaborative, document-graph database for the realtime web. Prior to 3.1.0, Document::purge_edges in surrealdb/core/src/doc/delete.rs automatically removed graph edge records with permissions disabled through opt.clone().with_perms(false) when a connected node was deleted, bypassing the edge table's PERMISSIONS FOR delete and PERMISSIONS FOR select clauses. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.0. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 7.7 | Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Prior to 2.21.8, Postiz fails to verify Nowpayments IPN callback authenticity against the payment provider shared secret and reads the target subscription identifier from the untrusted request body, allowing a low-privileged account to grant arbitrary organizations lifetime PRO subscriptions without payment. This issue is fixed in version 2.21.8. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 5.3 | AdGuard Home is a network-wide software for blocking ads and tracking. Prior to 0.107.75, AdGuard Home's client-triggered DoQ forwarding path to a udp:// upstream reduced backend UDP DNS state by producing dns_id=0 or txid=0 and exposed a quoted-port ICMP source-port oracle, weakening DNS response matching for forwarded queries. This issue is fixed in version 0.107.75. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 7.5 | Diffusers is the a library for pretrained diffusion models. Prior to 0.38.0, Diffusers' DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained flow can bypass the trust_remote_code guard because download() validates model_index.json and custom pipeline code before later loading from a cached folder that can change, allowing a Hub repository with custom .py pipeline code to execute through the custom pipeline flow without passing custom_pipeline or trust_remote_code=True. This issue is fixed in version 0.38.0. |
| Exploit 25d ago | 7.5 | Composer is a dependency Manager for the PHP language. Prior to 1.10.28, 2.2.28, and 2.9.8, Composer\IO\BaseIO::loadConfiguration() validates GitHub OAuth tokens with the regex ^[.A-Za-z0-9_]+$ and interpolates rejected tokens into an UnexpectedValueException; GitHub Actions GITHUB_TOKEN values using the ghs_<id>_<base64url-JWT> format can contain -, fail validation, and be disclosed to stderr or CI logs. This issue is fixed in versions 1.10.28, 2.2.28, and 2.9.8. |
| 25d ago | 7.5 | As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20187 are related to improper handling of exceptional conditions that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-703. |
| 25d ago | 7.5 | As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20158 are related to improper control of a resource through its lifetime that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-664. |
| 25d ago | 7.5 | As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20157 are related to missing encryption that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-311. |
| 25d ago | 8.1 | As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20156 are related to improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-119. |